1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Tuesday, January 02, 2007

    Amen: The epidemic of diagnoses:

    This epidemic is a threat to your health. It has two distinct sources. One is the medicalization of everyday life. Most of us experience physical or emotional sensations we don’t like, and in the past, this was considered a part of life. Increasingly, however, such sensations are considered symptoms of disease. Everyday experiences like insomnia, sadness, twitchy legs and impaired sex drive now become diagnoses: sleep disorder, depression, restless leg syndrome and sexual dysfunction.

    Perhaps most worrisome is the medicalization of childhood. If children cough after exercising, they have asthma; if they have trouble reading, they are dyslexic; if they are unhappy, they are depressed; and if they alternate between unhappiness and liveliness, they have bipolar disorder. While these diagnoses may benefit the few with severe symptoms, one has to wonder about the effect on the many whose symptoms are mild, intermittent or transient.

    ...The epidemic of diagnoses has many causes. More diagnoses mean more money for drug manufacturers, hospitals, physicians and disease advocacy groups. Researchers, and even the disease-based organization of the National Institutes of Health, secure their stature (and financing) by promoting the detection of “their” disease. Medico-legal concerns also drive the epidemic. While failing to make a diagnosis can result in lawsuits, there are no corresponding penalties for overdiagnosis. Thus, the path of least resistance for clinicians is to diagnose liberally — even when we wonder if doing so really helps our patients.


    We're all a part of the problem.
     

    posted by Sydney on 1/02/2007 07:52:00 PM 4 comments

    4 Comments:

    Don't forget that patients demand a diagnosis, as well. I've always been a non-interventionalist at heart, but it's cost me patients, and revenue. Watchful waiting is a lost art.

    A secondary pronlem is that making a diagnosis from fuzzy indications can obfuscate the real diagnosis later on.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:07 AM  

    Too true.

    There's also a tendency for some patients to become heavily invested in the original fuzzy diagnosis, which makes it even harder to adequately treat the real diagnosis when it surfaces.

    By Blogger Sydney, at 1:02 PM  

    Remember, from the other side of the desk, we as patients, are given diagnosis with great certainty, and often dire outcomes, if we do not follow the doctor's orders. Add to this many doctors desire to be cutting edge and you get people very quick to point to a problem that may or may not exist.

    Steve Lucas

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:55 AM  

    I think the original article wasn't as much about patients' wanting a diagnosis for bothersome symptoms as about healthy symptomless people being converted into sick people for the sake of prevention.

    The authors specifically mentioned the ever-changing guidelines for preventive drugs. The also specifically mentioned overdiagnosis and overtreatment with testing.

    How many healthy symptomless people demand "diagnosis"? Yet instead of clearly explaining the real chance they will personally benefit, the doctors say "this will reduce your risk by n%" making an uninformed patient think he/she is in imminent danger without the drug. Many patients don't demandnon-recommended tests either yet many doctors order them. I understand some patients demand every test they see on TV, but those of us who don't would appreciate if they are not ordered without adequate reason and explanation why. Our relationship with doctors is not equal. I find it difficult to ask my doctor "why are you ordering urinalysis when USPSTF recommends against it?" because I don't want to be labelled "difficult". Sometimes it is just easier to comply and pray you will not be the one with a false positive or "overdiagnosed". And most people don't even know what is recommended and why. Most people don't understand that there is risk of harm with every test.

    As far as patients' not being afraid of overdiagnosis - most patients are not aware of it. Ads on TV don't mention it; websites describing the test don't mention it and doctors forget to mention it either. Those who heard the word don't appreciate the potential harm. Few realize that their chance of hearing the dreaded word "cancer" is higher if they are screened and that treatment for these overdiagnosed cases has serious risks. They also don't know the actual probability for them personally to benefit from each test. All they are told are "this is a horrible desease", "n people are diagnosed with it every year", "this test will reduce mortality by 30%" or the most ridiculous of all "more people survive 5 years after diagnosis if it is made early" (do doctors understand lead-time bias?). People who refuse are labelled "irresponsible"; if they do get the desease, they are made to feel guilty.

    With guidelines getting stricter and stricter and tests becoming more and more accurate, there soon will be no "healthy" people left.

    I think the solution is in making us more informed - more openness about risks and more accurate representation of the benefits, and presenting preventive drugs and tests as a personal choice and not an obligation. As a side benefit, you might get more informed juries in "this wasn't done early enough cases".

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:11 AM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006