1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Sunday, April 28, 2002

    Mixed-Up Media: Are certain types of diabetes drugs safe or dangerous? (requires New York Times registration) The media isn't sure. The Reuters story says that Avandia, a drug that makes the body more sensitive to insulin, has been found to be free of liver toxicity:

    "A review of clinical trials originally conducted by SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals--the maker of Avandia--was undertaken by Dr. Harold E. Lebovitz of State University of New York in Brooklyn. Lebovitz, who is a major stock shareholder in SmithKline Beecham, also sits on the company's advisory board.

    For the review, Lebovitz and his team re-examined the data from 13 studies that originally aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of Avandia.

    "No evidence of (liver toxic) effects was observed in studies that involved 5,006 patients taking rosiglitazone," Lebovitz and colleagues write.” (Admitttedly, he might be a little biased.)

    Yet, the New York Times says Avandia and a related drug, Actos, are risky:

    “GlaxoSmithKline and Eli Lilly & Company have added warnings about heart and liver risks to the labels of their diabetes drugs, which are similar to a medication that was withdrawn from the market in 2000 because of links to fatal liver damage.

    The Food and Drug Administration posted information today about heart and liver risks in Glaxo's drug, Avandia, and in Actos from Lilly, although warnings were added to the labels earlier.”

    Actually, the New York Times story is wrong. The FDA did issue a warning about both Actos and Avandia, but it wasn’t about liver damage, it was about the risk of congestive heart failure. Even then, the FDA is being very conservative in issuing the warning. They based the decision on studies that compared people who take insulin alone to people who take both insulin and one of the drugs. The studies involved small numbers of patients, making it difficult to generalize the results. Only four of 566 patients in the Actos study developed heart failure. No numbers are given for the Avandia study. It’s not clear that these are clinically significant differences, especially when you consider that people with diabetes are already at risk for heart failure. That risk is higher for those whose diabetes is poorly controlled. Since both Avandia and Actos work by increasing the body’s sensitivity to insulin, they are used in patients who are not responding well to insulin alone. It could just be that the patients on both insulin and the drugs were in poorer health to begin with and had a higher risk of heart problems than those on insulin alone.
     

    posted by Sydney on 4/28/2002 05:37:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006