1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Wednesday, October 23, 2002

    Homocysteine - Hype or Heart Risk? A new study suggests that the hype over homocysteine levels and heart disease may not be justified. The paper, which appears today in JAMA is a meta-analysis of previous studies done on homocysteine and heart disease. Meta-analysis itself is a hazardous game, since it involves mixing together a lot of other statistical results and applying statistics to them yet again. When badly done, it can magnify the statistical mistakes of the orginal studies. But this paper was not badly done, it was well-done. It applies the meta-analysis to studies that looked at homocysteine levels after heart disease was diagnosed and to studies that looked at homocysteine levels in healthy people and waited for heart disease to occur, then compares the results between the two. It turns out that the prospective studies were less biased and showed less of a risk of heart disease with elevated homocysteine levels than the retrospective studies.

    Not surprisingly, the researchers who have invested their life’s work in elevated homcysteine levels and their contribution to heart disease are skeptical, yet their comments to the press underscore frailty of the association of high homocysteine levels with the risk of heart disease:

    After allowing for other risk factors like high blood pressure and smoking, Dr. Clarke's team found that a person who lowered his homocysteine level 25 percent cut the heart-attack risk 11 percent and the stroke risk 19 percent.

    "That's still a significant association," said Dr. Paul F. Jacques, chief of nutritional epidemiology for the Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, part of the Agriculture Department. "It's a modest predictor. But it's all in how you define modest."


    Is it all that significant to reduce the risk, not the incidence, by 8 percentage points? Not really. By any definition, it’s a modest decrease. Then there’s this:

    Dr. Stampfer cited a study in the journal of the medical association in August. In it, half of 553 heart patients in Switzerland who had operations to reopen clogged arteries were randomly assigned to receive six months of vitamin B therapy. Those who took the therapy had significantly fewer deaths and heart attacks. In the group that took the vitamins, 2.6 percent had nonfatal heart attacks versus 4.3 percent in the control group.

    Again, a decrease of what amounts to a little more than one percentage point in incidence isn’t really significant in any sense other than the statistical one.

    This may seem to be a tempest in a teapot, since homocysteine levels can be altered with diet and with folic acid supplements, but there is a growing movement among cardiologists to use statins, the cholesterol drugs, to treat high homocysteine levels, too. Before that move is made, they’d better make sure there’s a truly clinically significant role for them in heart disease.
     

    posted by Sydney on 10/23/2002 09:04:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006