1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Tuesday, January 21, 2003

    More Condom Capers: Jane Brody discusses condoms:

    A newly published survey of 779 sexually active unmarried women 18 to 24 who were recent condom users revealed that in the previous three months 44 percent had waited too long for the condom to be applied.

    The delay may have exposed them to viable sperm and infectious organisms, including H.I.V. And 19 percent reported that the condom slipped or broke in intercourse, placing them at risk of disease and pregnancy.


    But, taking a page from the lately very vocal condom crowd, she attributes this not to the inherent risk of condom use, but to the stupidity of their users:

    Other studies also suggest that the problem of obtaining maximum protection from condom use is often compounded by inadequate knowledge about the way to apply and remove condoms properly and ways to minimize the risk of breakage and slippage.

    She then goes on to overestimate the reliability and effectiveness of condoms:

    Used properly and consistently, condoms are 97 percent to 98 percent effective in preventing pregnancy and provide the best possible protection, short of total abstinence from sexual activity, against sexually transmitted infections, including H.I.V. and the human papillomavirus, which can cause cervical cancer.

    While condoms may be better than no protection, they in no way approach the 97 to 98 percent effectiveness range in real use. Nor do they protect against HPV, largely because HPV lesions can be on the scrotum, which of course, isn’t covered with a condom. And although, in a perfect world, it might be possible to use condoms perfectly every time, we must face up to their limitations. Even among highly motivated couples who took part in the study of HIV transmission and condom use that Ms. Brody cited, the proper and consistent use of them was astonishlingly low. They began with 304 couples. Some relationships ended during the study. For the rest:

    Of the 256 couples who continued to have sexual relations for more than three months after enrollment in the study, only 124 (48.4 percent) used condoms consistently for vaginal and anal intercourse.

    Not very reassuring, is it? For who among us is so perfect to do everything exactly right all the time?

     

    posted by Sydney on 1/21/2003 08:04:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006