1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Monday, September 22, 2003

    Cutting Edge for Deep Pockets: A while back I mentioned a patient of mine who was spending $600 a month on an injectable parathyroid hormone to help with osteoporosis. Or at least his insurance company was paying for it. The sticking point was that the drug wasn’t all that effective in clinical trials - at least not $600 a month effective. The brother of that drug is in the news today, having recently been found to be more effective when used alone than when used in combination with an oral osteoporosis drug, Fosamax:

    The interim results come from a one-year study, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, in 238 post-menopausal women.

    Some received only Preos, a bioengineered full-length version of human parathyroid hormone, some only Fosamax, an osteoporosis drug sold by Merck & Co., while others were treated with both drugs.

    Bone mineral density at the spine increased in all the treatment groups, but was highest, at a rate of 6.3 percent, in the parathyroid hormone group. The volume of spongy bone at the center of the spine also increased, but the 24 percent increase in the parathyroid hormone group was about twice that found in either of the other groups.

    Increased bone density at the hip was highest with Fosamax, but the volume of bone was actually higher with Preos. 'The inference is that you're building new bone on the outside,' Black said, noting that other studies suggest that it takes more than a year of hormone therapy for bones to mineralize.


    Notice that the end-spin is that the parathyroid hormone is more effective than Fosamax, no matter how you slice it. But in reality, it isn’t all that much more effective. For men, taking parathyroid hormone for thirty months increased the bone density at the spine by a mean of 18% compared to 8% for Fosamax. In the hip, parathyroid hormone increased the bone density by 6% compared to 4% for Fosamax.

    And the findings in women were even less impressive. Parathyroid hormone increased bone density in the lumbar spine after one year of use by a mean of 6%, while Fosamax increased it by 4%. In the hip, parathyroid hormone increased bone density by less than 1%, while Fosamax increased it by 2%.

    Fosamax itself isn’t cheap (anywhere from $80 to $150 per month), but it’s still a lot less expensive than parathyroid hormone. And even more to the point - neither of them bring about dramatic changes in bone density. The risk of fractures is still very real in their users. Which leaves one wondering if either of them are truly worth their price.
     

    posted by Sydney on 9/22/2003 10:12:00 PM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006