1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Tuesday, December 02, 2003

    Virtual Colonoscopies: Who wouldn't prefer a fifteen minute non-invasive procedure over a sedation-required roto-rooter?

    A new study finds that virtual colonoscopy, a method that uses a C.T. scanner for colon cancer screening, can be just as effective as traditional colonoscopy in finding polyps, the mushroomlike growths from which most cancers arise.

    Patients having the 15-minute virtual screening test simply lie down and hold their breath for about 10 seconds, exhale, then hold their breath again while a C.T. scanner X-rays their colons, creating detailed, three-dimensional images of the walls. With traditional colonoscopy, patients are sedated while a doctor threads a long flexible tube into the colon, spending half an hour viewing its walls in much the same sort of detail. Then they wait in a recovery room for about an hour as the sedative wears off.


    But, it's as expensive as a traditional colonoscopy (anywhere from $500 to $2,000) and this is the first study that found it to be effective:

    Virtual colonoscopy has been around for nearly a decade, but it has never been on the recommended list of screening tests. In previous studies it missed as many as half of even the large polyps that are most worrisome. The difference this time, said Dr. Pickhardt, is in the method.

    The study researchers used a computer program that revealed the colon in three dimensions. Most other virtual colonoscopy has involved two-dimensional slices created from C.T. scan images. The patients in the new study also drank a fluid that labeled fecal material so doctors did not confuse it with polyps.


    The accompanying editorial in the New England Journal (available without subscription today, although you have to download a pdf version) points out that the other difference between this study and others is that the researchers didn't include the non-precancerous polyps the virtual colonoscopy failed to find.

    That may not make much of a difference clinically since those types of polyps don't go on to become cancer, but the other interesting aside is that only 50% of the study subjects said they would choose the virtual colonoscope over the conventional one if given a choice. That's not too surprising. Most of my patients tell me the worst part of the colonscopy is preparing for it (cleaning the bowels out completely.) And if a virtual colonoscope finds polyps, then the patient has to go on to a regular colonoscope to have them removed, which means another prep. Yuk.
     

    posted by Sydney on 12/02/2003 08:19:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006