1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Monday, April 05, 2004

    Second Hand Killers: A new study says that living with smokers can kill you:

    Evidence that living with a smoker can shorten your life has emerged from a study in New Zealand.

    The study, one of the largest ever done, looked at deaths among people aged 45 to 74 who completed census returns in 1981 and in 1996.

    Those who had never smoked but lived with people who did were 15 per cent more likely to die in the three years after each census than were those who had never smoked and lived with non-smokers.


    The original article is available here, but only in pdf form. The actual numbers aren't as impressive as the relative risk reported in the London Times and other media stories would have you believe. Here's what they found:

    From 1981 to 1984, men who were never exposed to tobacco smoke had a mortality rate of 1,530/100,000, or a mortalty rate of 1.5%. Men who had been exposed to someone else's tobacco smoke had a mortality rate of 1,684/100,000, or of 1.7% - only a 0.2% difference. For women during those years, the numbers were 1009/100,000 for those who were never exposed to tobacco smoke and 1050/100,000 for those who were exposed to second hand smoke. Both translate into a mortality rate of 1%.

    From 1996 to 1999, men who were never exposed to tobacco smoke had a mortality rate of 1025/100,000 or 1% and men who were exposed to second hand smoke had a mortality rate of 1198/100,000 or 1.2%. Again, a 0.2% difference. For some reason, women during this time period had more of a difference than the previous decade. Women with no history of tobacco smoke exposure had a mortality rate of 672/100,000 or 0.7%, but those who had exposure had a mortality rate of 855/100,000 or 0.9%.

    The authors call the increased mortality rate among those exposed to second-hand smoke "modest but consistent," although in the case of women, it isn't even consistent. And it's far too modest to justify Draconian anti-smoking laws.

     

    posted by Sydney on 4/05/2004 08:31:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006