medpundit |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
Sunday, November 07, 2004Does that mean Clinton and Gore relied on the homophobic, ignorant masses? Or does it mean that our moral values have changed dramatically in the past four years, from those that Democratic elites deem appropriate to ones that they deem abominable? Neither, of course. It means the phrase "moral values" is extremely nebulous and can be defined in any way one wants to suit whatever purpose one wants when intrepreting exit poll data, anyway. Chances are, when people rank "moral values" as their top reason for voting, they mean the moral values of the candidates, which basically boils down to which of the two they trust the most. Sorry, pundocracy. The lesson of the election is that you have to convince the electorate to trust you to do a good job. Just like any other job interview. posted by Sydney on 11/07/2004 09:17:00 AM 0 comments 0 Comments: |
![]() ![]() |