1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Saturday, December 11, 2004

    Tailoring Therapy: A genetic test can predict a patient's response to breast cancer chemotherapy:

    By screening tumor samples for 21 genes implicated in the disease, the test provides doctors with a much more detailed picture of the nature of breast cancer in each patient. It is a step toward the goal of "individualized cancer care.''

    Results described in several studies at the conference show that the test does a good job at identifying women who are least likely to have a recurrence. These women might want to forgo chemotherapy, which has multiple side effects and can cost more than $15,000.

    On the other hand, women found by the test to be at high risk of recurrence may still benefit from that knowledge, because their cancers appear to be much more responsive to chemotherapy than those in the low-risk group. A study presented at the conference showed that patients identified as high-risk by the new test were 70 percent less likely to have a recurrence if they had chemotherapy.


    The study involved choosing the 21 genes for testing from other studies that showed they correlated positively with aggressive breast cancer expression. The authors then looked for those genes in breast tumors that had been removed as part of another study that looked at the effectiveness of tamoxifen in preventing breast cancer. They developed a scoring system of low, medium, or high risk for recurrence based on the number of genes expressed by the tumors. There genetic assay appears to be quite predictive, more so, in fact, than the usual methods of predicting aggressiveness, such as patient age, tumor size, or how chaotic and immature the tumor cells are:

    Many patients (51 percent of the patients in the study) were categorized as having a low risk, and their rate of distant recurrence at 10 years was 6.8 percent. A smaller group of patients (27 percent) was categorized as having a high risk; their rate of distant recurrence at 10 years was 30.5 percent — a risk similar to that observed among patients with node positive disease.

    It's not a perfect predictor, however, since some of the low scoring tumors still managed to recur:

    A low risk was defined as a recurrence score of less than 18, an intermediate risk as a score of 18 or higher but less than 31, and a high risk as a score of 31 or higher. There were 28 recurrences in the low-risk group, 25 in the intermediate- risk group, and 56 in the high-risk group.

    But still, it's a very promising first step toward individually tailored therapeutics.
     

    posted by Sydney on 12/11/2004 07:48:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006