1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Tuesday, January 11, 2005

    Ethics: Regarding coverage responsibilities, from a reader:

    Sorry the ice storm has you off the net. Of course, the ethical thing would be for you to refer your readership to a blog that is online or get someone to cover your call.

    Well, there is the list of medical blogs over to the left that all provide excellent coverage.

    He also sends a link to this paper from last week's New England Journal of Medicine about the role of physicians assigned to military intelligence in interrogation:

    In testimony taken in February 2004, as part of an inquiry into abuses at Abu Ghraib (and recently made public under the Freedom of Information Act and posted on the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union [ACLU] at www.aclu.org), Colonel Thomas M. Pappas, chief of military intelligence at the prison, described physicians' systematic role in developing and executing interrogation strategies. Military intelligence teams, Pappas said, prepared individualized "interrogation plans" for detainees that included a "sleep plan" and medical standards. "A physician and a psychiatrist," he added, "are on hand to monitor what we are doing."

    What was in these interrogation plans? None have become public, though Pappas's testimony indicates that he showed army investigators a sample, including a sleep deprivation schedule. However, a January 2004 "Memorandum for Record" (also available on the ACLU Web site) lays out an "Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy" calling for aggressive measures. Among these approaches are "dietary manipulation — minimum bread and water, monitored by medics"; "environmental manipulation — i.e., reducing A.C. [air conditioning] in summer, lower[ing] heat in winter"; "sleep management — for 72-hour time period maximum, monitored by medics"; "sensory deprivation — for 72-hour time period maximum, monitored by medics"; "isolation — for longer than 30 days"; "stress positions"; and "presence of working dogs."

    Physicians collaborated with prison guards and military interrogators to put such approaches into practice. "Typically," said Pappas, military intelligence personnel give guards "a copy of the interrogation plan and a written note as to how to execute [it]. . . . The doctor and psychiatrist also look at the files to see what the interrogation plan recommends; they have the final say as to what is implemented." The psychiatrist would accompany interrogators to the prison and "review all those people under a management plan and provide feedback as to whether they were being medically and physically taken care of," said Pappas. These practices, he conceded, were without precedent. "The execution of this type of operation . . . is not codified in doctrine," he said. "Except for Guantanamo Bay, this sort of thing was a first."

    At both Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, "behavioral science consultation teams" advised military intelligence personnel on interrogation tactics. These teams, each of which included psychologists and a psychiatrist, functioned more formally at Guantanamo; staff shortages and other administrative difficulties reduced their role at Abu Ghraib.

    A slide presentation prepared by medical ethics advisors to the military as a starting point for internal discussion poses a hypothetical case that, we were told, is a "thinly veiled" account of actual events. A physician newly deployed to "Irakistan" must decide whether to post physician assistants and medics behind a one-way mirror during interrogations. A military police commander tells the doctor that "the way this worked with the unit here before you was: We'd capture a guy; the medic would screen him and ensure he was fit for interrogation. If he had questions he'd check with the supervising doctor. The medic would get his screening signed by the doc. After that, the medic would watch over the interrogation from behind the glass."


    The Army argues that the physicians and medics in these situations are functioning in much the same way that doctors do in occupational medicine, and that seems exactly right. As described above, their main role seems to be to insure that interrogation techniques cause no harm and that the detainees are physically strong enough to withstand them. They are there, in other words, to make sure their fellow soldiers don't cross the line.
     

    posted by Sydney on 1/11/2005 07:32:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006