1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Monday, January 02, 2006

    New York Letters: Today's New York Times has some good, astute letters to the editors today. First, insight into the South Korean cloning scandal:

    The scientific scandal involving Dr. Hwang Woo Suk of Seoul National University raises another issue with very serious implications.

    The article states that Dr. Hwang's "research on stem cells and cloning propelled him to international stardom." Such "stardom" is not possible without the complicity of the news media.

    The media don't create outsized egos in all-too-human scientists, but they feed them. This "cult of personality" is not benign. It perverts science. It is particularly insidious in forensic science, where the media-anointed "experts" become unassailable and testify with someone's life and liberty in the balance.

    The measure of accomplishment in science is the long-term respect of qualified peers, not media glorification.


    Exactly. If the media scrutinized the claims of scientists and researchers with half the zeal they scrutinize CEO's and [some] politicians, fewer would grasp so meanly at glory.

    Then, there are several responses to Paul Krugman's take on healthcare in the United States. His solution is to have government take over. Readers disagree:

    Paul Krugman proposes that "to get health reform right," decisions about which treatments are provided should be entrusted to the public sector.

    While the power of the government to intrude on the doctor-patient relationship might solve budgetary problems, Mr. Krugman's proposal would no doubt result in decreased options for patients. If this prescription were followed, we would ultimately have a one-size-fits-all, Wal-Mart-style health care system.

    Whatever the conflicts and biases of physicians, their underlying priority is the welfare of patients. The priority of a public-sector system that controls health care decisions would be budgets, not patients.


    Another points out that we already have government-driven healthcare:

    Paul Krugman calls for government to be the referee in our enormously expensive health care system, but doesn't mention that government already makes most of the calls through Medicare price controls affecting hospitals and doctors.

    These decisions affect much more than the roughly 50 percent of health care provided by government programs, because Medicare has provisions that limit physicians' ability to care for non-Medicare patients of Medicare age and because private insurance companies adopt Medicare fee schedules.

    It is a mistake to think that even more government intervention is the key to solving a crisis that has been made worse by an already ambitious system of government price controls.


    (Since insurance companies base their payments to doctors and hospitals as a percentage of Medicare's reimbursement, the fact is we already have a system controlled by the government.)

    And who trusts politicians?

    Paul Krugman argues that "ordinary citizens" do not "have enough medical expertise" to make their own decisions about their health care. But he does not explain why the government would be any better.

    If individuals don't know enough about their own bodies to decide among the many doctors, drugs and treatments available, why would a bunch of politicians?


    Which is one reason health savings accounts are a better option:

    Paul Krugman dismisses health savings accounts, but my personal experience suggests that they do indeed cut down on frivolous visits to the doctor - for instance, when my child has a cold.

    My high-deductible insurance policy, about 50 percent cheaper than a traditional one, protects me from big-ticket items.

    If every American were enrolled in this system, health care consumption and insurance premiums would drop even further, and perhaps the government would have a role in helping the poor pay for these plans.


    He's got a point.
     

    posted by Sydney on 1/02/2006 02:02:00 PM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006