1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Monday, March 13, 2006

    Don't Pay Us No Nevermind: America's cardiologists are a meeting this week (that explains why it was so hard to find a cardiologist this weekend), and they've come up with some startling findings that call into question some of the previous findings they've previously trumpeted. For example, the blood thinner Plavix, they now say, not only doesn't prevent heart attacks, it might cause them:

    A startling new study has doctors rethinking the practice of prescribing the blood thinner Plavix in combination with low-dose aspirin to patients at risk of a first heart attack or stroke.

    The international study included more than 15,000 patients with heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. The conclusion: The tandem therapy was of some benefit to those with diagnosed heart disease, but it nearly doubled the risk of death, heart attack or stroke in patients with heart-threatening conditions such as high cholesterol and high blood pressure.

    Study co-author Dr. Eric Topol, a professor of genetics at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland and a leading U.S. heart expert, urged doctors Monday to stop prescribing Plavix (clopidogrel) plus aspirin to patients who have not had a previous heart attack or stroke.


    Plavix is most commonly used in people who have already had strokes or heart attacks. It isn't commonly used as a first line therapy for stroke and heart disease protection in people who've never had either. At least, it isn't used that way in my neck of the woods.

    Doubling the risk of death does, indeed, sound dire. If it's that dangerous for people who haven't had strokes or heart attacks, why is it safe for those who have? Aren't they worse off to begin with? Well, maybe that's the point. They have less to lose and more to gain. Here's Dr. Topol's study (Don't you love the name? "Charisma").

    He and his coresearchers divided 15,603 people who had either actual cardiovascular disease (but no prior strokes or heart attacks) or multiple risk factors for heart disease and stroke and divided them up into two groups. One group received Plavix and aspirin for 28 months and the other received a placebo and aspirin for 28 months. They then counted how many in each group had heart attacks and/or strokes, both fatal and nonfatal. They found that 6.8 percent of the Plavix and aspirin group had such events compard to 7.3 percent of the aspirin and placebo group. That seems a plus for Plavix. But, when they looked closer and considered only a sub-group of patients who had no known cardiovascular disease - only risk factors - they found that 6.6 percent of the Plavix and aspirin group had events compared to only 5.5 percent of the aspirin and placebo group. And when they narrowed it even further, to consider only those subjects who met with death by heart attack or stroke during the 28 months of the study, the difference was 3.9% vs. 2.2% - the "nearly doubled" risk of death, or an absolute difference of 1.7%.

    Well, that's a difference, but not a big one. The better lesson to take home from the study is that Plavix ($117 per month) plus aspirin isn't much better than aspirin alone ( $2.00 a month) in preventing strokes and heart attacks.

    The other news out of the cardiologists' get-together is that the fashionable use of B-vitamins and folic acid to prevent heart disease doesn't measure up to scrutiny. The study (full text here) really didn't find much difference in the rates of death, heart attacks, and strokes between a folate/B-vitamin complex and a placebo. At least, nothing beyond a percentage point or two, despite the decrease in homocysteine levels among the vitamin users. Oh well, at least they aren't expensive.
     

    posted by Sydney on 3/13/2006 09:24:00 PM 1 comments

    1 Comments:

    I heard the presentation by the researcher who did the B vitamin study. One of the panelists for ACC commended her for presenting "negative" research results. She was quite elegant in her response and pointed out that the results were not "negative", rather neutral. The audience applauded.
    And while the Walgreen generic version of B vitamins may not be expensive, the "designer" version with prescription doses of folate can be fairly pricy.
    Cardio NP

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:34 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006