1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Sunday, July 16, 2006

    A Beautiful Mind: Who said this?

    Let us reflect now on what mathematics is. In itself it is an abstract system, an invention of the human spirit, and as such in its purity it does not really exist. It is always realized approximately, but – as such – it is an intellectual system, a great, brilliant invention of the human spirit. The surprising thing is that this invention of our human mind is truly the key for understanding nature, that nature is really structured in a mathematical way, and that our mathematics, which our spirit invented, really is the instrument for being able to work with nature, to put it at our service through technology.

    It seems an almost incredible thing to me that an invention of the human intellect and the structure of the universe coincide: the mathematics we invented really gives us access to the nature of the universe and permits us to use it. [...] I think that this intersection between what we have thought up and how nature unfolds and behaves is an enigma and a great challenge, because we see that, in the end, there is one logic that links these two: our reason could not discover the other if there were not an identical logic at the source of both.

    In this sense, it seems to me that mathematics – in which God as such does not appear – shows us the intelligent structure of the of the universe. Now there are also theories of chaos, but these are limited, because if chaos had the upper hand, all technology would become impossible. Technology is trustworthy only because our mathematics is trustworthy. Our science, which ultimately makes it possible to work with the energies of nature, presupposes the trustworthy, intelligent structure of matter, [...] the “design” of creation.


    Hint: He's a German, but not this one

    Give up? It's him.

    More interesting thoughts here.
     

    posted by Sydney on 7/16/2006 12:00:00 AM 5 comments

    5 Comments:

    Some might say that mathematics is the only thing which does exist, the only truth there is in the universe. We didn't invent it, we discovered it. It was already there before we existed. Perhaps mathematics IS God.

    By Blogger Greg P, at 11:14 PM  

    In the beginning there was the Word,and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Maybe they're right! (But is mathematics capable of love?)

    By Blogger sydney, at 5:54 PM  

    Ah, a can of worms indeed.
    Is God capable of love? Of what kind is the love of God as we see it, experience it? Seemingly a tough kind of love.

    By Blogger Greg P, at 10:13 PM  

    Well, from a Christian perspective, God is love. Suffering doesn't exist because God's love is tough, but because our fallen human nature tends to warp love. Love at its purest is closest to God. (C.S. Lewis's The Four Loves is a wonderful look at God as love, or love as God.)

    God as Reason (mathematics?) vs. God as Love seems to be contrary to the way we experience things, though, doesn't it? Reason is cold and hard and unemotional; love is warm and soft and purely emotional.

    By Blogger sydney, at 1:13 PM  

    > We didn't invent it,
    > we discovered it.

    Philospohy! I love it!

    It seems to me that mathematics is a special case of reason. What we have "invented" (and I do not care for this description) is a set of notational and mechanical formalisms that permit us to use the fruits of this kind of reason without constant, time-consuming resort to the first principles.

    We did not "invent" reason -- it is something we simply have or do. It is a part of our nature. One does not find reason floating around the universe, independent of a person. To wax theological for a moment, we got our nature from God, and He gives what He's got as a part of His nature.

    > love is warm and soft and
    > purely emotional.

    I had thought Syd, that you have teenage kids. If so, then you know that love at times can be kinda hard on the beloved. One of your earlier commenters has noted this with respect to divine love. Its relationship to parental love is not to be overlooked.

    And love is not purely emotional: it is an act of the will. Our Lord did not command us to have an emotion when He said "Husbands, love your wives" or "love your neighbor as yourself". In the end, love is the only reasonable response to dignity; human or divine. Sometimes warm and soft emotion comes with love, and it is a good thing it does. But love is not an emotion.

    t

    By Blogger Tom Leith, at 3:02 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006