1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Friday, September 01, 2006

    He Who Pays the Piper: Yet another disadvantage of employer-based health insurance coverage - your employer may have access to sensitive information:

    McCann said he discovered that the county's insurance office had gotten access to his medication records in violation of federal medical privacy law, known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA.

    ``They could have at least asked me to sign off on this so they could have asked my physician to provide documentation on why the medication was prescribed, but they didn't,'' he said.

    The longtime public employee said his doctor prescribed three drugs -- one used as an anti-anxiety medication -- to treat restless leg syndrome and has never suggested that he see a psychiatrist.

    The county ``jumped to conclusions,'' McCann said. ``They had no way of knowing what the drug was prescribed for; they just looked at the name and said, aha!''

    McCann said he was told by Caremark, the Nashville-based company that manages the county's pharmacy benefits, that the county had access to his records twice, two days before he was ordered to see a psychiatrist and in mid-May, about 10 days before his unpaid administrative leave with the county ended.


    He was fired for insubordination and arguing with his supervisors. That should be enough grounds without snooping in his medical files.
     

    posted by Sydney on 9/01/2006 08:54:00 AM 4 comments

    4 Comments:

    Between this quote:

    "McCann said he was told by Caremark, the Nashville-based company that manages the county's pharmacy benefits, that the county had access to his records twice, two days before he was ordered to see a psychiatrist and in mid-May, about 10 days before his unpaid administrative leave with the county ended."

    and this one:

    "County Law Director Karen Doty said Thursday she had not seen McCann's complaint. ``I know that we did not violate any HIPAA regulations,'' she said, ``and if he wants to bring another action, yet another one, against us, I guess we don't have really any choice but to defend ourselves.'",

    methinks Summit County had better start socking away money to pay for this guy's settlement.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:29 AM  

    I doubt this story. I have seen the reports that insurance companies give employers. All it gives are summary statistics of usage. It contains no names of employees.

    By Blogger Jake, at 11:50 AM  

    ..."may have access" ? I was a risk manager for a TPA that administered self funded plans, including its own. I can assure you, legal or not, PHI was routinely reviewed and sometimes used in very unethical ways. There is no "may have" about it, they do have access, and some use it.

    By Blogger Intelinurse2B, at 12:04 PM  

    Longish post - sorry.

    About the same risk of improper disclosure is present in any plan, including a government sponsored plan.

    To believe otherwise requires one to believe that government clerks are more aware of the law, more careful to observe it, and more protective of individuals' privacy than insurance company clerks. That's just not believable.

    That's why I think the risk is about the same, regardless who sponsors of the plan - which means this is not a distinguishing characteristic of employer-sponsored plans.

    If the plan is self-administered (as some private and public plans are) or if the employer happens to be an insurance company, the steps necessary to avert improper disclosure are more difficult but still manageable.

    It must be recognized that no system of administrative controls can absolutely guarantee that no data will ever be disclosed improperly. This is because people are involved, and people make mistakes. As T.S. Eliot once observed, "There can be no system so perfoect that no one needs to be good."

    BTW, any TPA employee who provides medical information to a client in a form that permits individual identification is breaking the law. If the correspondent above saw this happening, and failed to report it, she might also be held legally accountable.

    Be well - and secure!

    --John Fembup

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:51 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006