1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Sunday, October 15, 2006

    Old Fashioned Medicine: Once upon a time, general practitioners used to perform minor surgeries such as hernia repairs, appendectomies and tonsillectomies at their home offices or in the patient's home. That was before surgery and anesthesiology became the sophisticated specialties that they are today. Yesterday is today at England's National Health Service:

    Minor surgery such as hernia repairs and varicose vein removal will be carried out in family doctors’ surgeries instead of in hospitals under plans to be announced by Patricia Hewitt, the health secretary, this week.

    Ministers believe that up to half of the 45m hospital outpatient appointments can be dealt with by GPs and nurses in local health centres. It will save the National Health Service money by freeing up hospital beds which cost about £300 a day. Ministers say surgery in local health centres will make better use of highly trained GPs and be more convenient for patients.

    Lord Warner, the minister for NHS reform, said: “The rationale behind providing care closer to home is to make better use of highly specialist skills . . . this will involve (having) GPs who are as skilled with the scalpel as they are with the stethoscope.”


    Dr. Crippen is not amused. Nor would I be. Will they hold in-office surgeries to the same standards as in-hospital surgeries? How many GP's possess surgical skills and knowledge? Few in this day and age I imagine. But, that's what happens when politicians dictate the practice of medicine.

    UPDATE: More laughter at the expense of the NHS, via Dr. Crippen's comment section.
     

    posted by Sydney on 10/15/2006 05:43:00 PM 3 comments

    3 Comments:

    GP's administering anesthesia, eh?

    Well, in honor of the thought that "yesterday is today" let's look back at one of George Bernard Shaw's little observations from one of those yesterdays in about 1913:

    "Treat every death as a possible and under our present system a probable murder, by making it the subject of a reasonably conducted inquest; and execute the doctor, if necessary, as a doctor, by striking him off the register."

    Anyone doubt that would be next for NHS?

    Amazing is it not, to hear intelligent people argue that single-payer systems controlled by bureaucrats and politicians are really and truly responsive to public and patient needs?

    John Fembup

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:28 PM  

    Surgeons must be very careful
    When they take the knife!
    Underneath their fine incisions
    Stirs the Culprit-Life!

    -Emily Dickinson

    In addition, there are several plausible reasons not mentioned in the article:

    1. A shortage of surgeons.
    2. The primary care trust keeps the patient. By doing this, they are less in debt to the hospital at the end of the year, since they usually don't have enough money to pay for the patients they do send to the hospital. So, I imagine this arrangement is okay with the hospitals and surgeons.
    3. The operative mortality rate for surgery is four times higher than the US. For complicated patients, it's nine times higher. Maybe they stand a better chance in the local surgeries.

    The MRSA risk they quote is not trivial, either. It is a major problem there and if I could stay out of the hospital, I would.

    By Anonymous dani, at 1:08 PM  

    Policymakers have a wonderful way of dreaming up policies that affect other people rather than themselves. Now what if policymakers had to use the NHS ALWAYS in their own medical treatment? Would MPs mind being surgically operated on by GPs? I put the broader question to policymakers by asking ‘elected representatives of all UK political parties [to] voluntarily refrain from self-paid or insurance-paid medical care treatment.' This 'Acid Test of MP support for the NHS' was delivered by way of petition at www.ourpetition.org. 47 MPs in all have signed the petition to-date. 35 MPs were Labour, 11 were Liberal Democrats. Only 1 MP signatory was Conservative (no, it was not Mr. Cameron). Dr. Crippen has commented on the health petition in his article “Putting your money where your mouth is” where he supports the notion the great and the good should try using their own medical creations, ALWAYS. If they did, perhaps one day we could look forward to accessing a world-class NHS free at the point of delivery. If you want to see if your own MP has signed visit www.ourpetition.org. If he or she has not, why not write them to find out why? You can also lobby your MP by signing the petition yourself. Richard Solomon, Campaign Organiser, www.ourpetition.org

    By Anonymous Richard Solomon, at 6:54 AM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006