1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Sunday, November 19, 2006

    Casting Blame: When it becomes prohibitively expensive to paint your house, you can blame these guys:

    LANCASTER, Ohio - The city has become the latest in Ohio to sue Sherwin-Williams Co. and other paint manufacturers, trying to force them to clean up lead-based paint because of the risk of lead poisoning in children.

    City Council voted unanimously to seek to have Cleveland-based Sherwin-Williams and the other seven defendants identify and get rid of lead in all buildings in Lancaster, about 30 miles southeast of Columbus.

    ...The paint makers already are being sued by Toledo, East Cleveland and Akron.

    ...Earlier this year, a Rhode Island jury found Sherwin-Williams, NL Industries Inc. and Millennium Holdings LLC liable for creating a public nuisance by manufacturing and selling a toxic product.


    Akron has sensibly dropped its suit. That last link includes more information about the anti-paint company lawsuits:

    Last February, a Rhode Island jury recommended a cleanup that could cost Sherwin-Williams and two other paint companies more than $3.5 billion. The state of Rhode Island filed its landmark case in 1999. The first trial ended in 2002 with a hung jury.

    Similar suits are pending in six states: Wisconsin, New Jersey, California, New York, Texas and Missouri.


    $3.5 billion is a lot of money. And that's just the small state of Rhode Island. The Federal government banned the use of lead paint in 1978, but it was in 1955 that the paint companies stopped selling it, or at least significantly decreased the amounts of lead they used.

    According to this article, there was a concerted tobacco-like effort to ignore or minimize the dangers of lead, but that cover-up was by the lead industry, not the paint industry:

    In 1939, the National Paint, Varnish and Lacquer Association (NPVLA), a trade group representing pigment and paint manufacturers, among others, privately acknowledged its "responsibility to the public and the protection of the industry itself with respect to the use of toxic materials in the industry's products". In a letter marked "CONFIDENTIAL Not for Publication," the association informed its members that "the vital factor concerning toxic materials is to intelligently safeguard the public." The letter said that manufacturers should apply "every precautionary measure in manufacturing, in selling and in use where toxic materials are likely to or do enter a product" and noted that "children's toys, equipment, furniture, etc. are not the only consideration". It warned NPVLA members that toxic materials "may enter the body through the lungs ... through the skin, or through the mouth or stomach." The letter specifically pointed out that lead compounds such as white lead, red lead, litharge, and lead chromate, may be considered as toxic if they find their way into the stomach.

    The NPVLA reproduced for its members a set of legal principles established by the Manufacturing Chemists' Association regarding the labeling of dangerous products. The first principle was "A manufacturer who puts out a dangerous article or substance without accompanying it with a warning as to its dangerous properties is ordinarily liable for any damage which results from such failure to warn." Even when a product was widely understood to be dangerous, the Manufacturing Chemists' Association suggested that warnings be included. Further, the legal principles stated "The manufacturer must know the qualities of his product and cannot escape liability on the ground that he did not know it to be dangerous." The NPVLA letter concluded by calling on NPVLA members to make a "sincere effort in taking advantage of every possible precaution in the use of toxic materials.


    That article has many ads for lead-based paint, all of them by Dutch Boy. So why isn't Dutch Boy being sued?
     

    posted by sydney on 11/19/2006 09:03:00 AM 2 comments

    2 Comments:

    Dutchboy paints is a division of the Sherwin Williams company. Many of the older small paint companies have been bought up over the years by larger ones like SW.

    For some reason, the Dutchboy site has a direct link to the EPA's webpages about lead and paints.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:04 PM  

    nice site
    http://www.babycare.net.in

    baby care is not the meaning of only physical care of baby but also think about the Perception and sensory development,
    Communication and language development,Cognitive development,Emotional Development ,Social Development.

    By Anonymous baby care, at 8:44 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006