medpundit |
||
|
Friday, November 24, 2006However, in the real world, there are evidently doctors who assume active roles in the lives of their patients. From a NEJM review of Rita Charon's Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness: As Charon's story unfolds, we see her paying for one patient to join a gym, providing (guided but amateur) psychotherapy to another, and springing a third from a nursing home to care for her in the patient's home. Having come to know patients through the sorts of stories that link us to our friends and relatives, she responds as a whole person to them as whole people, unconfined by the traditional strictures of her profession (and sometimes, as she acknowledges, teetering on the edge of riskily inappropriate behavior). Why would appreciating a patient's life story (or "narrative") necessarily lead to the crossing of boundaries like that? It's possible to appreciate another person's humanity without entwining ones own life with theirs. Psychiastrists have been listening to their patient's narratives since the dawn of their specialty, and are especially sensitive to the temptation to break professional boundaries. Those traditional strictures are there for a reason. P.S. This is still the best version of Rex Morgan - ever. posted by Sydney on 11/24/2006 08:54:00 PM 2 comments 2 Comments:
I really don't think that appreciating the history and life of a patient should necessitate those kinds of transgressions. Granted, I haven't cracked my copy of the book yet (I'll read her story when I get home), but it seems to me that paying for a patient to join a gym, for example, is inappropriate behaviour for a physician. If she has become that friendly with the patient, she should be treating him/her? By Kelly Hills, at 11:24 PM But Charon is a post-modernist, and so the rules do not apply to her. By 5:26 PM , at |
|