1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Friday, January 05, 2007

    Poxes: The American Academy of Pediatrics is now recommending a second chickenpox vaccine just prior to entering kindergarten. This has been something that's been brewing for some time, since it's becoming obvious that kids who had the first vaccine sometimes end up with chickenpox when they're older. We don't see chickenpox with anywhere near the frequency we did before the vaccine, but it's probably prudent to get the booster dose to avoid the infection in young adulthood or late teenage years when it's much worse than having it as a child.

    However, I question this statement from the article:

    Help paying for vaccines should be available to most people covered by private insurance or Medicaid.

    Most health insurance plans that cover immunizations will pay for vaccinations that are recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Bocchini said. Government insurance programs also cover the shots.


    It's true they pay for one dose of chickenpox vaccine as that's been approved for several years, but don't assume they'll pay for a second dose. Although the booster is listed on the 2007 CDC immunization schedule, which is the guideline most third party payers follow, it usually takes the insurance comapnies about a year to catch up. A good example is the human papilloma virus vaccine. It's on the recommendations, and it's gotten a lot of publicity. Even though I've had patients ask for it, once I tell them the price ($180$140/dose) they decide to check with their insurance company first. I've yet to have anyone call back to say they'll take it.

    UPDATE: I corrected the price of the HPV vaccine. It's $140 per dose in the US. It's the shingles vaccine (Zostavax) that's $180 per dose. Haven't had any takers on that one, either, once they've been given the price.
     

    posted by sydney on 1/05/2007 08:14:00 AM 4 comments

    4 Comments:

    $180!!!! In Oz, to buy privately is about US$40-50 a jab. Somebody is making a bit of money over there?

    Benedict

    By Blogger Benedict 16th, at 6:59 PM  

    Some medical company is always making a bit of money over here. You could say we subsidize your $40-$50 vaccine, your devices and all of your drugs.

    Companies charge what the market will bear- that's basic capitalism.

    By Anonymous Danie, at 9:15 AM  

    Danie,
    So what you are saying that because of Capitalism, you pay more for your drugs, there must be some very happy rich people around you!

    A colleague went to India recently and bought some Azithromicin for me About US$1.10 for 30x 500mg, in Oz that would be about US$270 cost here.

    So tell me again how big pharma making big profits helps us all? (no don't that was sarcasm!)

    Benedict

    Declared interestged - absolutely no shares, especially not in pharma*

    By Blogger Benedict 16th, at 9:12 AM  

    Benedict,
    I am not supporting the pharmaceutical industry's practices, just stating the facts.

    It is a fact that if we want new and better meds, someone has to pay, and right now that is the American citizen (something which may change with the new Congress allowing imports from Canada, which is not good for the Canadians). Pharmaceutical companies must make a profit, or none of us gets new drugs. Including you and the folks in India.

    However, it is what companies do with their profits that's the problem. The best solution would be to ban direct-to-consumer advertising, which every country has done except the USA and New Zealand. Since about half of pharmaceutical company revenues go to marketing, this could have an enormous impact on cost. It also decreases the amount of drugs used, which hasn't been shown to be of any great detriment to the populations whose countries have such laws.

    By Anonymous Danie, at 11:04 AM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006