1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Wednesday, February 14, 2007

    Twisted Findings: The FDA is warning us about the new Rotavirus vaccine:

    The government warned on Tuesday of potentially life-threatening twisting of the intestines in infants vaccinated against a virus that is the leading cause of early childhood diarrhea.

    The condition, called intussusception, is the same that led to the withdrawal of the first rotavirus vaccine eight years ago.

    The Food and Drug Administration said it was unknown whether the recently approved vaccine, called RotaTeq, caused the 28 new cases. The condition also can occur spontaneously. Indeed, the reports don't exceed the numbers expected to occur naturally each year _ the so-called background rate, the FDA said.


    I've been reluctant to use the RotaTeq vaccine because of just this possibility. Not that I thought it would cause more intussusceptions (the preliminary studies showed that the indicence of this particular side effect was no different than spontaneous cases), but because the FDA was likely to issue a warning such as this. In the public's eye (and the eye of the plaintiff's bar), a warning from a government agency says that there's a problem, not that there "might" be a problem. When the Weather Service issues a tornado or flood or winter storm warning means the tornado, flood, or winter storm is happening now - not that it might happen. Maybe the FDA should initiate a "watch" category, just like the weather service, instead of making everything a warning.

    But one suspects that the real goal of the FDA's warnings against harms that have not occurred is to prove to the public that they aren't in bed with the pharmaceutical companies. We now have big black box warnings on anti-depressants that warn not against an actual increase of suicide with their use, but a slight increase in thoughts of suicide. But the RotaTeq warning is an even more egregious example of baseless warnings. If intussusception is happening in vaccinated children at the same rate that it's happening in unvaccinated children, then what's the beef?

    More thoughts on the FDA's risk aversion.
     

    posted by Sydney on 2/14/2007 11:35:00 AM 1 comments

    1 Comments:

    Part of the issue here is the recent problems with a number of drugs and the governments response to these situations. In today's WSJ we find under Vaccine Draws FDA Warning the following information:

    Michelle Goveia, medical director of pediatric medical affairs at Merck, said the company continues to believe that the vaccine should be administered to all children.

    and

    Some analysts have forecast that the vaccine could reach $500 million in sales by 2009.

    Given Merck's problems with Vioxx one has to question their veracity.

    Directly below the above article we find an article titled Witness Testifies Drug Maker Knew About Concers Over Ketec Study with the following quotes:

    A former employee of the Sanofi-Aventis SA contractor that oversaw a clinical trial of the antibiotic Ketek told Congress the drug maker knew there was evidence of a problem with the study before regulators discovered fraud.

    and

    Rep. Bart Stupak, another Michigan Democrat and chairman of its investigations subcommittee, said the FDA's interactions with the drug industry had become "incestuous."

    The excesses of the past are causing an increased scrutiny of the drug industry. As the drug industry has, in the past few years, placed all of it's bets on just a few drugs the need to create, not only a blockbuster product, but the surrounding buzz has caused some to engage in data manipulation.

    Until there is more transparency in drug trials, along with clearer data reporting, people will question every adverse reaction to every new drug, especially one that treats a condition not normally fatal in this country.

    Steve Lucas

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:56 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006