1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Thursday, March 15, 2007

    Demographic Storm: Don't plan on getting cancer in the future. There won't be anyone to treat you:

    The graying of America will swell the number of cancer patients and survivors 55% by 2020, according to a study that suggests doctors may not be able to cope with the additional burden.

    The analysis, published online Tuesday in the Journal of Oncology Practice, says the number of Americans who are diagnosed with cancer — both those in treatment and those who have finished therapy — will grow to 18.2 million, up from 11.7 million in 2005. Today, about one in 26 Americans have had cancer. By 2020, roughly one in 19 will have been diagnosed with the disease, says Edward Salsberg, an author of the study from the Association of American Medical Colleges' Center for Workforce Studies. Researchers based their analysis on data from the National Cancer Institute.

    ....More than half of medical oncologists are over 50 and could retire soon, the report shows. Though there are more than enough younger doctors to replace them, these new doctors still won't be able to keep up with the demand. Younger oncologists also tend to see fewer patients and are often more interested than older doctors in balancing work and family life, the report says. By 2020, the country could face a shortage of up to 4,000 cancer specialists.


    It won't just be cancer, as this blog has frequently opined. All of the disease of aging - heart disease, diabetes, cancer, arthritis, cancer, kidney disease - will be the rise at the same moment that the number of doctors available to treat them will be on the decline. Add to that the movement toward concierge and micropractice models that allow a doctor to assume responsibility for only a small number of patients and it doesn't bode well for the future of the public's health.
     

    posted by Sydney on 3/15/2007 10:10:00 PM 1 comments

    1 Comments:

    All the more reason to automate, automate, automate. It's possible to reduce the need for doctors by weeding out the "simple" problems so that they can be handled by less trained treaters. If you can reduce charting time, create a less bureaucratic process, and reduce all the other distractions that impact the vital part of the process (seeing patients) and you will reduce the need to import physicians to fill the gap. We're too rich to really feel a shortage. We can always relax our import standards. The excess dead will be living in the 3rd world, the marginal countries whose brain drain (often to the countries where we're actually getting our own foreign docs from) isn't fixable by importing from lower down on the chain. They're the end of the chain and it's their people who will suffer most.

    By Blogger TM, at 8:45 AM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006