Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.

  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup


    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov

    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.

    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel

    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:


    Medpundit RSS

    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff

    Who is medpundit?

    Tech Central Station Columns

    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews


    Medical Blogs


    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc




    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It


    SOAP Notes


    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle



    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log



    Doctor Mental



    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House



    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day


    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline


    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station





    The Skeptic's Dictionary

    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams

    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn

    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard

    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer

    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy

    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks

    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo

    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich



    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info



    Sunday, April 01, 2007

    Every Cloud Has Its Silver Lining Department: Public figures get cancer and lobbyists see a chance for money for their pet cause, even when their pet cause isn't cancer:

    Unfortunately, the bravery of these two high-profile figures — and that of thousands of other people coping with cancer far outside the media spotlight — is not yet being matched by bold action on the part of lawmakers and public health institutions. As a dietitian who works with cancer survivors, I still meet far too many people who don't realize the crucial role that healthy diets can play in cancer prevention and survival.

    ....Unhealthy food is backed by heavy-duty marketing muscle. The McDonald's Corp. alone spends more than a billion dollars a year marketing its products to consumers. Lawmakers should at least match that figure by pumping a billion dollars into new education efforts in support of healthy dietary patterns.

    Finding the political will to carve out that funding for nutrition education won't be easy. But if lawmakers need a shot of courage, they can simply look to Snow and Edwards for inspiration.

    The author works for a organization that promotes healthy eating for cancer patients. I have yet to meet the cancer that has been cured or prevented by "eating healthy." While it's certainly true that starving people have more difficulty fighting disease, we clearly do not live in a nation of starving people. And while it's certainly a worthy goal to encourage the sick and dying to eat well, it isn't a project that's worthy of our tax dollars, especially if funding it will take away from something more important - such as infrastructure or Medicaid funding.

    UPDATE: Comments suggest that The Cancer Project is really a PETA group with an agenda. Looks like that is correct:

    While PCRM presents itself as a doctor-supported, unbiased source of health guidance, the group’s own literature echoes Newsweek’s observation that 95 percent of its members have no medical degrees. And even the five-percent doctor membership that PCRM claims is open to question. Anyone claiming to be a physician or a medical student can join without paying a dime -- even if their only motivation is to collect free waiting-room reading material.

    ...The American Medical Association (AMA), which actually represents the medical profession, has called PCRM a “fringe organization” that uses “unethical tactics” and is “interested in perverting medical science.”

    PCRM is a font of medical disinformation. The group has argued, with a straight face, that experiments involving animal subjects “interfere with new drug development.” PCRM even rejects the consensus of the respectable medical community by claiming that animal experimentation “leads AIDS research astray.”

    PCRM discourages Americans from making donations to health charities like the American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, the American Foundation for AIDS Research, the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation, the American Red Cross, and even Boys Town. All because they support research that requires animals, in order to cure human diseases. PCRM’s multi-year crusade against the March of Dimes, which includes protests directed at March walkers, volunteers, and donors, has been reported widely.

    When I read the original op-ed, I had confused the Physician's Committee for Responsible Medicine with Physicians for Social Responsibility. Evidently, the two don't get along.

    posted by Sydney on 4/01/2007 08:28:00 AM 3 comments


    The Cancer Project is a PETA project under the guise of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:44 AM  



    By Blogger sydney, at 1:46 PM  

    Glad to be of help. I'm glad you pointed out that article because it cracked me up, with its calls for the need to "earmark serious new money for the woefully underfunded 5 A Day Program." I'd just written about what a waste of money it was, the complete failure of the program for 15 years now, and its 2000% increased budget since 1999. And, of course, every single "study" she cited has been similarly debunked.
    :) Sandy

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:36 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page


    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006