1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Friday, July 27, 2007

    Influence: Using flawed expert opinion to influence legislation:

    The same cannot be said of the testimony of Harvard Professors David Himmelstein and Elizabeth Warren, purported to be generally applicable social science. In fact, it was junk. Blandly entitled "Illness and Injury as Contributors to Bankruptcy," their long-discredited 2005 study may be one of the most misleading pieces of research ever placed before Congress — no small dishonor.

    The study's central findings were that 54½ percent of all bankruptcies have a "medical cause" and 46.2 percent of all bankruptcies have a "major medical cause." Even if this were true, bankruptcy law already provides adequate safeguards for the special problems posed by medical bankruptcies, as one of us (Mr. Zywicki) testified at the hearing. But it is not true. And the only way to make such a claim is to gerrymander the definition of medical bankruptcies to generate the desired results — true junk social science.

    For example, the study classifies uncontrolled gambling, drug or alcohol addiction, and the birth or adoption of a child as "a medical cause." There are indeed situations in which a researcher may legitimately classify those conditions as "medical," but a study used to prove Americans are going bankrupt as a result of crushing medical debt is not one of them.

    A father who has gambled away his family's mortgage payment is not the victim of crushing medical bills. Similarly, new parents who find they can no longer afford their previous lifestyle now that one of them has to stay home with the baby will usually find the obstetrician's bill the least of their problems. Babies are a financial hardship even when hospitals give them away free.

    But that's just the tip of the iceberg. The authors also classified bankruptcies as having a "major medical cause" if the debtors had more than $1,000 in accumulated, out-of-pocket medical expenses (uncovered by insurance) over the course of the two years prior to the bankruptcy, even if the debtors did not cite illness or injury as among the reasons for their bankruptcy.

    ...To put this figure in perspective, in 2001 (the year that was the basis for the study's sample) average per capita out-of-pocket medical expenses were $683 — meaning during that two-year period the average American spent about 30 percent more than their figure on uncovered medical expenses.


    To designate all cases involving expenses of more than $1,000, regardless of circumstances, as bankruptcies with a "major medical cause" is both silly and deliberately misleading. A bankruptcy with $1,001 in uncovered medical expenses and $50,000 on a Bloomingdale's card would constitute a "medical bankruptcy" in their study. Perhaps their expansive definition of "medical bankruptcy" should include self-proclaimed "shopaholics" as well.


    Well, of course it should! I'm sure a study could be designed to show that shopaholism is contagious, too, making it even more worthy of the illness designation.

    It's easy to blind them with science if you have the right credentials after your name.

    Here's another interesting tidbit from the piece:

    Among the most recent is a study of 5,203 bankruptcy filers (about threefold the number examined by Mr. Himmelstein and Miss Warren) by the Executive Office of the United States Trustee. It found 54 percent of filers listed no medical debt at all and that medical debt accounted for about 5½ percent of the total general unsecured debt.

    That's a lot smaller than we, the public, have been led to believe.
     

    posted by Sydney on 7/27/2007 08:33:00 AM 6 comments

    6 Comments:

    Miss Warren takes issues with those conclusions here:

    http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/warrenreports/2007/jul/26/no_medical_bankruptcies_a_fact_free_analysis

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:53 PM  

    If they can make up a study showing that medicine is responsible for bankruptcies, I bet the insurance industry could probably create a study blaming jury verdicts for high liability premiums, can't they?

    Nah, they wouldn't do that. . .and doctors wouldn't buy such a thing - they're too skeptical. Right?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:55 PM  

    I guess they have missed folks like me with 10,000 in medical debt on top of credit card debt from not being able to work. Us patients need to get our asses in gear, quite being irresponsible and just pay up.

    Who needs electricity or a house anyways?

    By Blogger tina, at 8:01 PM  

    There are secondary expenses to illness that are not apparent. A sort of cascade effect through one's whole life. For instance, a sudden drop in weight that causes you to need a whole new wardrobe for work - this is not a luxury if you want to keep your job.

    You find out your disease is one in which your diet must be restricted and the foods that you need are all much more expensive than the norm.

    Treatment co-payments are the only thing you can afford - except that you have to have a working car to get to work to pay for the payments. Trust me, it can spiral.

    I've also worked in banking - and the bankers are crooks. Usurious rates (once illegal - thank-you, Nixon[sarcasm off]) are charged by most lenders. They misrepresent loan types and do not disclose all terms and conditions in an understandable manner. Add someone desperate for some treatment, and you have some of the roots of a portion of people's debt.

    There are layers upon layers of causation and nothing is ever as simple as it seems.

    Pax,

    MLO

    By Anonymous MLO, at 11:40 PM  

    I agree it is not the medical bills that really cause the bankruptcies, it's the secondary effect of the illnesses. Too few people have adequate disability insurance policies, and many of those require one to be nearly brain dead to collect a dime.

    I know in my town the hospitals try to shift "bad debt" into "charity care" as soon as it becomes evident what kind of situation the patient is in. Not only is this ethical, it's good PR and keeps the hospital from trying to get blood out of the proverbial turnip, thus saving resources all around. I can't say what happens elsewhere.

    We know that poverty and poor health go hand in hand. What is not so clear is which causes which.

    By Anonymous lucky, at 12:12 AM  

    Here's a website you may find useful. http://www.addicted.com is a site for friends, families, and those who suffer from various addictions.

    By Blogger Addiction-Rehab, at 1:02 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006