1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Monday, August 06, 2007

    Pay for What? The "pay for performance" program that Medicare is rolling out is supposed to reward physicians for quality care, right? Think again:

    Ten large physician practices participating in one of the first Medicare pay-for-performance projects have proven that such programs lead to better performance, according to government officials. But only two practices were able to reduce costs enough to receive any additional pay.

    ... Two of the participants, Forsyth Medical Group in Winston-Salem, N.C., and St. John's Health System in Springfield, Mo., were able to make the grade on all diabetes measures.


    They made the grade, but they didn't get the reward:

    But for eight of the large practices, the amount of money they saved Medicare was not enough for them to share in the reward. Only University of Michigan Faculty Group Practice in Ann Arbor and Marshfield (Wis.) Clinic were able to obtain bonuses.

    It's really about the money:

    In the first year, Marshfield saved the Medicare trust fund just more than $6 million, and the facility is set to receive roughly $4.5 million of that. University of Michigan Faculty Group Practice saved Medicare about $3.5 million and is in line for a roughly $2.8 million payout.

    If it were really about quality, the Forsyth Group and St. John's Health System would be the ones getting the bonus, wouldn't they?
     

    posted by Sydney on 8/06/2007 08:13:00 PM 2 comments

    2 Comments:

    I don't quite get your complaint. Quality care should save money in the long run but if it was known ahead how much had to be saved then those that didn't might have provided quality care but didn't provide the combination; quality care and money save.
    Mary, mother of dermatologist Mike

    By Blogger Antique Sailor, at 8:26 PM  

    Antique Sailor,

    It doesn't necessarily follow that better quality= money saved, especially in medicine. Many of the interventions we do to improve quality are quite expensive. Colonoscopies to screen for colon cancer, for example, cost $2,000 each. Colonoscopies save lives, but it's not clear that they don't save money.

    Also, chronic diseases are progressive diseases. You can do everything right with a diabetic, and the diabetic himself can do everything right, but there comes a day when the day disease progresses - the control becomes harder to maintain, more drugs have to be added, complications develop, etc. That day is delayed by quality care, but it isn't forever postponed.

    By Blogger sydney, at 10:57 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006