1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Sunday, August 19, 2007

    You Broke It, You Bought It: The new Medicare denial model:

    In a significant policy change, Bush administration officials say that Medicare will no longer pay the extra costs of treating preventable errors, injuries and infections that occur in hospitals, a move they say could save lives and millions of dollars.

    Private insurers are considering similar changes, which they said could multiply the savings and benefits for patients.

    Under the new rules, to be published next week, Medicare will not pay hospitals for the costs of treating certain “conditions that could reasonably have been prevented.”

    Among the conditions that will be affected are bedsores, or pressure ulcers; injuries caused by falls; and infections resulting from the prolonged use of catheters in blood vessels or the bladder.


    It's probably reasonable to expect a hospital and surgeon to remove a left behind sponge at now added charge, but some of these conditions are difficult to avoid. Patients who require chronic urinary catheters, for instance, are notoriously prone to infection despite the best efforts to avoid them. And dying, chronically ill patients are prone to bed sores despite the best efforts to prevent them.

    Of course, refusing to pay for things does save money. But does it improve care? In this case, it's questionable.

    UPDATE: Physician Executive weighs in.

    UPDATE II: Readers of the New York Times weigh in:

    Even the most thoroughly researched preventive regimens continue to have substantial morbidity rates. Hospitals that already adhere to these guidelines (and there are many) will simply pay more and get paid less, without any improvement in their patient care.

    And another:

    Attempting to draw the line between truly preventable problems and those that are the result of prolonged therapy would seem to be a very slippery slope.

    That said, I would happily endorse the proposed Medicare policy change, if we as taxpayers could hold our government and military to the same standards and refuse to pay for any of their “preventable” mistakes.


    Heh.

    And a practical example:

    So, I admit Mrs. Jones, an elderly patient of mine, to the hospital because she has pneumonia. Because of the stress of the infection, she becomes delirious, which puts her at high risk of falling.

    In the interest of safety, I restrain and sedate her, which necessitates an indwelling urinary catheter.

    One week later, despite meticulous nursing care, Mrs. Jones develops a urinary tract infection and a minor pressure sore on her back because of her debilitated, immobilized state.

    My hospital administrator then suggests that I remove the restraints and the catheter and reduce the doses of her sedatives so that the conditions don’t get worse and our hospital doesn’t lose money.

    Two days later, Mrs. Jones falls out of bed and breaks her hip.

    How, exactly, has the new Medicare policy improved Mrs. Jones’s safety?
     

    posted by sydney on 8/19/2007 12:25:00 PM 2 comments

    2 Comments:

    Who else could have thought of such brilliant idea? Other than bureaucrats who have not taken care of pateints more than taking a glance and standing by them for photo-ops? Has anyone of these morons ever taken care of morbidly obese, malnourished, diabetic, immunocompromised patient who won't get out of bed because they can't and they don't have high tech beds to move them??? OMG, help us!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:50 PM  

    This sounds like an accident waiting to happen as America just gets more and more overweight. Having cared for overweight individuals before, it can be an uphill battle moving and taking care of them.

    By Anonymous Dara, at 4:44 PM  

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006